A tale of two speeches: Abbas and Netanyahu

The following are the texts of both speeches

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

The Question Palestine is intricately linked with the United Nations via the resolutions adopted by its various organs and agencies and via the essential and lauded role of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East – UNRWA – which embodies the international responsibility towards the plight of Palestine refugees, who are the victims of Al-Nakba (Catastrophe) that occurred in 1948.

We aspire for and seek a greater andmore effective role for the United Nations in working to achieve a just and comprehensive peace in our region that ensures the inalienable, legitimate national rights of the Palestinian people as defined by the resolutions of international legitimacy of the United Nations.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

A year ago, at this san1e time, distinguished leaders in this hall addressed the stalled peace efforts in our region. Everyone had high hopes for a new round of final status negotiations, which had begun in early September in Washington under the direct auspices of President Barack Obama and with participation of the Quartet, and with Egyptian and Jordanian participation, to reach a peace agreement within one year. We entered those negotiations with open hearts and attentive ears and sincere intentions, and we were ready with our documents, papers and proposals. But the negotiations broke down just weeks after their launch.

After this, we did not give up and did not cease our efforts for initiatives and contacts. Over the past year we did not leave a door to be knocked or channel to be tested or path to be taken and we did not ignore any formal or informal party of influence and stature to be addressed. We positively considered the various ideas and proposals and initiatives presented from many countries and parties. But all of these sincere efforts and endeavors undertaken by international parties were repeatedly wrecked by the positions of the Israeli government, which quickly dashed the hopes raised by the launch of negotiations last September.

The core issue here is that the Israeli government refuses to commit to terms of reference for the negotiations that are based on international law and United Nations resolutions, and that it frantically continues to intensify building of settlements on the territory of the State of Palestine.

Settlement activities embody the core of the policy of colonial military occupation of the land of the Palestinian people and all of the brutality of aggression and racial discrimination against our people that this policy entails. This policy, which constitutes a breach of international humanitarian law and United Nations resolutions, is the primary cause for the failure of the peace process, the collapse of dozens of opportunities, and the burial of the great hopes that arose from the signing of the Declaration of Principles in 1993 between the Palestine Liberation Organization and Israel to achieve a just peace that would begin a new era for our region.

The reports of United Nations missions as well as by several Israeli institutions and civil societies convey a horrific picture about the size of the settlement campaign, which the Israeli government does not hesitate to boast about and which it continues to execute through the systematic confiscation of the Palestinian lands and the construction of thousands of new settlement units in various areas of the West Bank, particularly in East Jerusalem, and accelerated construction of the annexation Wall that is eating up large tracts of our land, dividing it into separate and isolated islands and cantons, destroying family life and communities and the livelihoods of tens of thousands of families.

The occupying Power also continues to refuse permits for our people to build in Occupied East Jerusalem, at the same time that it intensifies its decades-long campaign of demolition and confiscation of homes, displacing Palestinian owners and residents under a multi-pronged policy of ethnic cleansing aimed at pushing them away from their ancestral homeland. In addition, orders have been issued to deport elected representatives from the city of Jerusalem.

The occupying Power also continues to undertake excavations that threaten our holy places, and its military checkpoints prevent our citizens from getting access to their mosques and churches, and it continues to besiege the Holy City with a ring of settlements imposed to separate the Holy City from the rest of the Palestinian cities.

The occupation is racing against time to redraw the borders on our land according to what it wants and to impose a fait accompli on the ground that changes the realities and that is undermining the realistic potential for the existence of the State of Palestine.

At the same time, the occupying Power continues to impose its blockade on the Gaza Strip and to target Palestinian civilians by assassinations, air strikes and artillery shelling, persisting with its war of aggression of three years ago on Gaza, which resulted in massive destruction of homes, schools, hospitals, and mosques, and the thousands of martyrs and wounded.

The occupying Power also continues its incursions in areas of the Palestinian National Authority through raids, arrests and killings at the checkpoints. In recent years, the criminal actions of armed settler militias, who enjoy the special protection of the occupation army, has intensified with the perpetration of frequent attacks against our people, targeting their homes, schools, universities, mosques, fields, crops and trees. Despite our repeated warnings, the occupying Power has not acted to curb these attacks and we hold them fully responsible for the crimes of the settlers.

These are just a few examples of the policy of the Israeli colonial settlement occupation, and this policy is responsible for the continued failure of the successive international attempts to salvage the peace process.

This policy will destroy the chances of achieving a two-State solution upon which there is an international consensus, and here I caution aloud: This settlement policy threatens to also undermine the structure of the Palestinian National Authority and even end its existence.

In addition, we now face the imposition new conditions not previously raised, conditions that will transform the raging conflict in our inflamed region into a religious conflict and a threat to the future of a million and a half Christian and Muslim Palestinians, citizens of Israel, a matter which we reject and which is impossible for us to accept being dragged into.

All of these actions taken by Israel in our country are unilateral actions and are not based on any earlier agreements. Indeed, what we witness is a selective application of the agreements aimed at perpetuating the occupation. Israel reoccupied the cities of the West Bank by a unilateral action, and reestablished the civil and military occupation by a unilateral action, and it is the one that detennines whether or not a Palestinian citizen has the right to reside in any part of the Palestinian Territory. And it is confiscating our land and our water and obstructing our movement as well as the movement of goods. And it is the one obstructing our whole destiny. All of this is unilateral.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

In 1974, our deceased leader Yasser Arafat came to this hall and assured the Members of the General Assembly of our affinnative pursuit for peace, urging the United Nations to realize the inalienable national rights of the Palestinian people, stating: “Do not let the olive branch fall from my hand.”

In 1988, President Arafat again addressed the General Assembly, which convened in Geneva to hear him, where he submitted the Palestinian peace program adopted by the Palestine National Council at its session held that year in Algeria.

When we adopted this program, we were taking a painful and very difficult step for all of us, especially those, including myself, who were forced to leave their homes and their towns and villages, carrying only some of our belongings and our grief and our memories and the keys of our homes to the camps of exile and the Diaspora in the 1948 AI-Nakba, one of the worst operations of uprooting, destruction and removal of a vibrant and cohesive society that had been contributing in a pioneering and leading way m the cultural, educational and economic renaissance of the Arab Middle East.

Yet, because we believe in peace and because of our conviction in international legitimacy, and because we had the courage to make difficult decisions for our people, and in the absence of absolute justice, we decided to adopt the path of relative justice – justice that is possible and could correct part of the grave historical injustice committed against our people.

Thus, we agreed to establish the State of Palestine on only 22% of the territory of historical Palestine – on all the Palestinian Territory occupied by Israel in 1967.

We, by taking that historic step, which was welcomed by the States of the world, made a major concession in order to achieve a historic compromise that would allow peace to be made in the land of peace.

In the years that followed – from the Madrid Conference and the Washington negotiations leading to the Oslo agreement, which was signed 18 years ago in the garden of the White House and was linked with the letters of mutual recognition between the PLO and Israel, we persevered and dealt positively and responsibly with all efforts aimed at the achievement of a lasting peace agreement. Yet, as we said earlier, every initiative and every conference and every new round of negotiations and every movement was shattered on the rock of the Israeli settlement expansion project.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

I confirm, on behalf of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, which will remain so until the end of the conflict in all its aspects and until the resolution of all final status issues, the following:

I. The goal of the Palestinian people is the realization of their inalienable national rights in their independent State of Palestine, with East Jerusalem as its capital, on all the land of the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip, which Israel occupied in the June 1967 war, in conformity with the resolutions of international legitimacy and with the achievement of a just and agreed upon solution to the Palestine refugee issue in accordance with resolution 194, as stipulated in the Arab Peace Initiative which presented the consensus Arab vision to resolve the core the Arab-Israeli conflict and to achieve a just and comprehensive peace. To this we adhere and this is what we are working to achieve. Achieving this desired peace also requires the release of political prisoners and detainees in Israeli prisons without delay.

2. The PLO and the Palestinian people adhere to the renouncement of violence and rejection and condemning of terrorism in all its forms, especially State terrorism, and adhere to all agreements signed between the Palestine Liberation Organization and Israel.

3. We adhere to the option of negotiating a lasting solution to the conflict in accordance with resolutions of international legitimacy. Here, I declare that the Palestine Liberation Organization is ready to return immediately to the negotiating table on the basis of the adopted terms of reference based on international legitimacy and a complete cessation of settlement activities.

4. Our people will continue their popular peaceful resistance to the Israeli occupation and its settlement and apartheid policies and its construction of the racist annexation Wall, and they receive support for their resistance, which is consistent with international humanitarian law and international conventions and has the support of peace activists from Israel and around the world, reflecting an impressive, inspiring and courageous example of the strength of this defenseless people, armed only with their dreams, courage, hope and slogans in the face of bullets, tanks, tear gas and bulldozers.

5. When we bring our plight and our case to this international podium, it is a confirmation of our reliance on the political and diplomatic option and is a confirmation that we do not undertake unilateral steps. Our efforts are not aimed at isolating Israel or de-legitimizing it; rather we want to gain legitimacy for the cause of the people of Palestine. We only aim to de-legitimize the settlement activities, the occupation and apartheid and the logic of ruthless force, and we believe that all the countries of the world stand with us in this regard.

I am here to say on behalf of the Palestinian people and the Palestine Liberation Organization: We extend our hands to the Israeli government and the Israeli people for peacemaking. I say to them: Let us urgently build together a future for our children where they can enjoy freedom, security and prosperity. Let us build the bridges of dialogue instead of checkpoints and walls of separation, and build cooperative relations based on parity and equity between two neighboring States – Palestine and Israel – instead of policies of occupation, settlement, war and eliminating the other.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Despite the unquestionable right of our people to self-determination and to the independence of our State as stipulated in international resolutions, we have accepted in the past few years to engage in what appeared to be a test of our worthiness, entitlement and eligibility.

During the last two years our national authority has implemented a program to build our State institutions. Despite the extraordinary situation and the Israeli obstacles imposed, a serious extensive project was launched that has included the implementation of plans to enhance and advance the judiciary and the apparatus for maintenance of order and security, to develop the administrative, financial, and oversight systems, to upgrade the performance of institutions, and to enhance self-reliance to reduce the need for foreign aid. With the thankful support of Arab countries and donors from friendly countries, a number of large infrastructure projects have been implemented, focused on various aspects of service, with special attention to rural and marginalized areas.

In the midst of this massive national project, we have been strengthening what we seeking to be the features of our State: from the preservation of security for the citizen and public order; to the promotion of judicial authority and rule of law; to strengthening the role of women via legislation, laws and participation; to ensuring the protection of public freedoms and strengthening the role of civil society institutions; to institutionalizing rules and regulations for ensuring accountability and transparency in the work of our Ministries and departments; to entrenching the pillars of democracy as the basis for the Palestinian political life.

When division struck the unity of our homeland, people and institutions, we were determined to adopt dialogue for restoration of our unity. We succeeded months ago in achieving national reconciliation and we hope that its implementation will be accelerated in the coming weeks. The core pillar of this reconciliation was to turn to the people through legislative and presidential elections within a year, because the State we want will be a State characterized by the rule of law, democratic exercise and protection of the freedoms and equality of all citizens without any discrimination and the transfer of power through the ballot box.

The reports issued recently by the United Nations, the World Bank, the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee (AHLC) and the International Monetary Fund confirm and laud what has been accomplished, considering it a remarkable and unprecedented model. The consensus conclusion by the AHLC a few days ago here described what has been accomplished as a “remarkable international success story” and confirmed the readiness of the Palestinian people and their institutions for the immediate independence of the State of Palestine.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

It is no longer possible to redress the issue of the blockage of the horizon of the peace talks with the same means and methods that have been repeatedly tried and proven unsuccessful over the past years. The crisis is far too deep to be neglected, and what is more dangerous are attempts to simply circumvent it or postpone its explosion.

It is neither possible, nor practical, nor acceptable to return to conducting business as usual, as if everything is fine. It is futile to go into negotiations without clear parameters and in the absence of credibility and a specific timetable. Negotiations will be meaningless as long as the occupation army on the ground continues to entrench its occupation, instead of rolling it back, and continues to change the demography of our country in order to create a new basis on which to alter the borders.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

It is a moment of truth and my people are waiting to hear the answer of the world. Will it allow Israel to continue its occupation, the only occupation in the world? Will it allow Israel to remain a State above the law and accountability? Will it allow Israel to continue rejecting the resolutions of the Security Council and the General Assembly of the United Nations and the International Court of Justice and the positions of the overwhelming majority of countries in the world?

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

I come before you today from the Holy Land, the land of Palestine, the land of divine messages, ascension of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) and the birthplace of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him), to speak on behalf of the Palestinian people in the homeland and in the Diaspora, to say, after 63 years of suffering of an ongoing Nakba: Enough.

It is time for the Palestinian people to gain their freedom and independence. The time has come to end the suffering and the plight of millions of Palestine refugees in the homeland and the Diaspora, to end their displacement and to realize their rights, some of them forced to take refuge more than once in different places of the world.

At a time when the Arab peoples affirm their quest for democracy – the Arab Spring – the time is now for the Palestinian Spring, the time for independence. The time has come for our men, women and children to live normal lives, for them to be able to sleep without waiting for the worst that the next day will bring; for mothers to be assured that their children will return home without fear of suffering killing, arrest or humiliation; for students to be able to go to their schools and universities without checkpoints obstructing them.

The time has come for sick people to be able to reach hospitals normally, and for our farmers to be able to take care of their good land without fear of the occupation seizing the land and its water, which the wall prevents access to, or fear of the settlers, for whom settlements are being built on our land and who are uprooting and burning the olive trees that have existed for hundreds of years. The time has come for the thousands of prisoners to be released from the prisons to return to their families and their children to become a part of building their homeland, for the freedom of which they have sacrificed.

My people desire to exercise their right to enjoy a normal life like the rest of humanity. They believe what the great poet Mahmoud Darwish said: Standing here, staying here, permanent here, eternal here, and we have one goal, one, one: to be.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

We profoundly appreciate and value the positions of all States that have supported our struggle and our rights and recognized the State of Palestine following the Declaration of Independence in 1988, as well as the countries that have recently recognized the State of Palestine and those that have upgraded the level of Palestine’s representation in their capitals. I also salute the Secretary-General, who said a few days ago that the Palestinian State should have been established years ago.

Be assured that this support for our people is more valuable to them than you can imagine, for it makes them feel that someone is listening to their narrative and that their tragedy and the horrors of

Al-Nakba and the occupation, from which they have so suffered, are not being ignored. And, it reinforces their hope that stems from the belief that justice is possible in this in this world. The loss of hope is the most ferocious enemy of peace and despair is the strongest ally of extremism.

I say: The time has come for my courageous and proud people, after decades of displacement and colonial occupation and ceaseless suffering, to live like other peoples of the earth, free in a sovereign and independent homeland.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

I would like to inform you that, before delivering this statement, I, in my capacity as President of the State of Palestine and Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Palestine Liberation Organization, submitted to H.E. Mr. Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, an application for the admission of Palestine on the basis of the 4 June 1967 borders, with AI-Quds AI-Sharif as its capital, as a full member of the United Nations.

I call upon Mr. Secretary-General to expedite transmittal of our request to the Security Council, and I call upon the distinguished members of the Security Council to vote in favor of our full membership. I also appeal to the States that have not yet recognized the State of Palestine to do so.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

The support of the countries of the world for our endeavor is a victory for truth, freedom, justice, law and international legitimacy, and it provides tremendous support for the peace option and enhances the chances of success of the negotiations.

Excellencies, Ladies and Gentlemen,

Your support for the establishment of the State of Palestine and for its admission to the United Nations as a full member is the greatest contribution to peacemaking in the Holy Land.

I thank you.


Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu

Ladies and gentlemen, Israel has extended its hand in peace from the moment it was
established 63 years ago. On behalf of Israel and the Jewish people, I extend that
hand again today. I extend it to the people of Egypt and Jordan, with renewed
friendship for neighbors with whom we have made peace. I extend it to the people of
Turkey, with respect and good will. I extend it to the people of Libya and Tunisia,
with admiration for those trying to build a democratic future. I extend it to the other
peoples of North Africa and the Arabian Peninsula, with whom we want to forge a
new beginning. I extend it to the people of Syria, Lebanon and Iran, with awe at the
courage of those fighting brutal repression.

But most especially, I extend my hand to the Palestinian people, with whom we seek a
just and lasting peace.

Ladies and gentlemen, in Israel our hope for peace never wanes. Our scientists,
doctors, innovator apply their genius to improve the world of tomorrow. Our artists,
our writers, enrich the heritage of humanity. Now, I know that this is not exactly the
image of Israel that is often portrayed in this hall. After all, it was here in 1975 that
the age-old yearning of my people to restore our national life in our ancient biblical
homeland — it was then that this was branded shamefully, as racism. And it was here
in 1980, right here, that the historic peace agreement between Israel and Egypt wasn’t
praised; it was denounced! And it’s here, year after year that Israel is unjustly singled
out for condemnation. It’s singled out for condemnation more often than all the
nations of the world combined. Twenty-one out of the 27 General Assembly
resolutions condemn Israel — the one true democracy in the Middle East.
Well, this is an unfortunate part of the U.N. institution. It’s the — the theater of the
absurd. It doesn’t only cast Israel as the villain; it often casts real villains in leading
roles: Gadhafi’s Libya chaired the U.N. Commission on Human Rights; Saddam’s
Iraq headed the U.N. Committee on Disarmament. You might say: That’s the past.
Well, here’s what’s happening now — right now, today, Hezbollah-controlled
Lebanon now presides over the U.N. Security Council. This means, in effect, that a
terror organization presides over the body entrusted with guaranteeing the world’s

You couldn’t make this thing up.

So here in the U.N., automatic majorities can decide anything. They can decide that
the sun sets in the west or rises in the west. I think the first has already been preordained.
But they can also decide — they have decided — that the Western Wall in
Jerusalem, Judaism’s holiest place, is occupied Palestinian territory.

And yet even here in the General Assembly, the truth can sometimes break through.
In 1984 when I was appointed Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations, I visited the
great rabbi of Lubavich. He said to me — and ladies and gentlemen, I don’t want any
of you to be offended because from personal experience of serving here, I know there
are many honorable men and women, many capable and decent people, serving their
nations here — But here’s what the rebbe said to me. He said to me, you’ll be serving
in a house of many lies. And then he said, remember that even in the darkest place,
the light of a single candle can be seen far and wide.

Today I hope that the light of truth will shine, if only for a few minutes, in a hall that
for too long has been a place of darkness for my country. So as Israel’s prime minister,
I didn’t come here to win applause. I came here to speak the truth. The truth is — the
truth is that Israel wants peace. The truth is that I want peace. The truth is that in the
Middle East at all times, but especially during these turbulent days, peace must be
anchored in security. The truth is that we cannot achieve peace through U.N.
resolutions, but only through direct negotiations between the parties. The truth is that
so far the Palestinians have refused to negotiate. The truth is that Israel wants peace
with a Palestinian state, but the Palestinians want a state without peace. And the truth
is you shouldn’t let that happen.

Ladies and gentlemen, when I first came here 27 years ago, the world was divided
between East and West. Since then the Cold War ended, great civilizations have risen
from centuries of slumber, hundreds of millions have been lifted out of poverty,
countless more are poised to follow, and the remarkable thing is that so far this
monumental historic shift has largely occurred peacefully. Yet a malignancy is now
growing between East and West that threatens the peace of all. It seeks not to liberate,
but to enslave, not to build, but to destroy.

That malignancy is militant Islam. It cloaks itself in the mantle of a great faith, yet it
murders Jews, Christians and Muslims alike with unforgiving impartiality. On
September 11th it killed thousands of Americans, and it left the twin towers in
smoldering ruins. Last night I laid a wreath on the 9/11 memorial. It was deeply
moving. But as I was going there, one thing echoed in my mind: the outrageous
words of the president of Iran on this podium yesterday. He implied that 9/11 was an
American conspiracy. Some of you left this hall. All of you should have.
Since 9/11, militant Islamists slaughtered countless other innocents — in London and Madrid, in Baghdad and Mumbai, in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, in every part of Israel. I believe that the greatest danger facing our world is that this fanaticism will arm itself with nuclear weapons. And this is precisely what Iran is trying to do.

Can you imagine that man who ranted here yesterday — can you imagine him armed
with nuclear weapons? The international community must stop Iran before it’s too late.

That would be a tragedy. Millions of Arabs have taken to the streets to replace
tyranny with liberty, and no one would benefit more than Israel if those committed to
freedom and peace would prevail.

This is my fervent hope. But as the prime minister of Israel, I cannot risk the future of
the Jewish state on wishful thinking. Leaders must see reality as it is, not as it ought to
be. We must do our best to shape the future, but we cannot wish away the dangers of
the present.

And the world around Israelis definitely becoming more dangerous. Militant Islam
has already taken over Lebanon and Gaza. It’s determined to tear apart the peace
treaties between Israel and Egypt and between Israel and Jordan. It’s poisoned many
Arab minds against Jews and Israel, against America and the West. It opposes not the
policies of Israel but the existence of Israel.

Now, some argue that the spread of militant Islam, especially in these turbulent times
— if you want to slow it down, they argue, Israel must hurry to make concessions, to
make territorial compromises. And this theory sounds simple. Basically it goes like
this: Leave the territory, and peace will be advanced. The moderates will best
rengthened, the radicals will be kept at bay. And don’t worry about the pesky details
of how Israel will actually defend itself; international troops will do the job.
These people say to me constantly: Just make a sweeping offer, and everything will
work out. You know, there’s only one problem with that theory. We’ve tried it and it
hasn’t worked. In 2000 Israel made a sweeping peace offer that met virtually all of
the Palestinian demands. Arafat rejected it. The Palestinians then launched a terror
attack that claimed a thousand Israeli lives.

Prime Minister Olmert afterwards made an even more sweeping offer, in 2008.
President Abbas didn’t even respond to it.

But Israel did more than just make sweeping offers. We actually left territory. We
withdrew from Lebanon in2000 and from every square inch of Gaza in 2005. That
didn’t calm the Islamic storm, the militant Islamic storm that threatens us. It only
brought the storm closer and made it stronger.

Hezbollah and Hamas fired thousands of rockets against our cities from the very
territories we vacated. See, when Israel left Lebanon and Gaza, the moderates didn’t
defeat the radicals, the moderates were devoured by the radicals. And I regret to say
that international troops like UNIFIL in Lebanon and EUBAM in Gaza didn’t stopthe
radicals from attacking Israel.

We left Gaza hoping for peace.

We didn’t freeze the settlements in Gaza, we uprooted them. We did exactly what the
theory says: Get out, go back to the 1967 borders, dismantle the settlements.
And I don’t think people remember how far we went to achieve this. We uprooted
thousands of people from their homes. We pulled children out of — out of their
schools and their kindergartens. We bulldozed synagogues. We even — we even
moved loved ones from their graves. And then, having done all that, we gave the keys
of Gaza to President Abbas.

Now the theory says it should all work out, and President Abbas and the Palestinian
Authority now could build a peaceful state in Gaza. You can remember that the entire
world applauded. They applauded our withdrawal as an act of great statesmanship. It
was a bold act of peace.

But ladies and gentlemen, we didn’t get peace. We got war. We got Iran, which
through its proxy Hamas promptly kicked out the Palestinian Authority. The
Palestinian Authority collapsed in a day — in one day.

President Abbas just said on this podium that the Palestinians are armed only with
their hopes and dreams. Yeah, hopes, dreams and 10,000 missiles and Grad rockets
supplied by Iran, not to mention the river of lethal weapons now flowing into Gaza
from the Sinai, from Libya, and from elsewhere.

Thousands of missiles have already rained down on our cities. So you might
understand that, given all this, Israelis rightly ask: What’s to prevent this from
happening again in the West Bank? See, most of our major cities in the south of the
country are within a few dozen kilometers from Gaza. But in the center of the country,
opposite the West Bank, our cities are a few hundred meters or at most a few
kilometers away from the edge of the West Bank.

So I want to ask you. Would any of you — would any of you bring danger so close to
your cities, to your families? Would you act so recklessly with the lives of your
citizens? Israelis prepared to have a Palestinian state in the West Bank, but we’re not
prepared to have another Gaza there. And that’s why we need to have real security
arrangements, which the Palestinians simply refuse to negotiate with us.
Israelis remember the bitter lessons of Gaza. Many of Israel’s critics ignore them.
They irresponsibly advise Israel to go down this same perilous path again. Your read
what these people say and it’s as if nothing happened — just repeating the same advice,
the same formulas as though none of this happened.

And these critics continue to press Israel to make far-reaching concessions without
first assuring Israel’s security. They praise those who unwittingly feed the insatiable
crocodile of militant Islam as bold statesmen. They cast as enemies of peace those of
us who insist that we must first erect a sturdy barrier to keep the crocodile out, or at
the very least jam an iron bar between its gaping jaws.

So in the face of the labels and the libels, Israel must heed better advice. Better a bad
press than a good eulogy, and better still would be a fair press whose sense of history
extends beyond breakfast, and which recognizes Israel’s legitimate security concerns.
I believe that in serious peace negotiations, these needs and concerns can be properly
addressed, but they will not be addressed without negotiations. And the needs are
many, because Israel is such a tiny country. Without Judea and Samaria, the West
Bank, Israel is all of 9 miles wide.

I want to put it for you in perspective, because you’re all in the city. That’s about twothirds
the length of Manhattan. It’s the distance between Battery Park and Columbia
University. And don’t forget that the people who live in Brooklyn and New Jersey are
considerably nicer than some of Israel’s neighbors.

So how do you — how do you protect such a tiny country, surrounded by people
sworn to its destruction and armed to the teeth by Iran? Obviously you can’t defend it
from within that narrow space alone. Israel needs greater strategic depth, and that’s
exactly why Security Council Resolution 242 didn’t require Israel to leave all the
territories it captured in the Six-Day War. It talked about withdrawal from territories,
to secure and defensible boundaries. And to defend itself, Israel must therefore
maintain a long-term Israeli military presence in critical strategic areas in the West

I explained this to President Abbas. He answered that if a Palestinian state was to be a
sovereign country, it could never accept such arrangements. Why not? America has
had troops in Japan, Germany and South Korea for more than a half a century. Britain
has had an an air base in Cyprus. France has forces in three independent African
nations. None of these states claim that they’re not sovereign countries.
And there are many other vital security issues that also must be addressed. Take the
issue of airspace. Again, Israel’s small dimensions create huge security problems.
America can be crossed by jet airplane in six hours. To fly across Israel, it takes three
minutes. So is Israel’s tiny airspace to be chopped in half and given to a Palestinian
state not at peace with Israel?

Our major international airport is a few kilometers away from the West Bank.
Without peace, will our planes become targets for antiaircraft missiles placed in the
adjacent Palestinian state? And how will we stop the smuggling into the West Bank?

I bring up these problems because they’re not theoretical problems. They’re very real.
And for Israelis, they’re life-and- death matters. All these potential cracks in Israel’s
security have to be sealed in a peace agreement before a Palestinian state is declared,
not afterwards, because if you leave it afterwards, they won’t be sealed. And these
problems will explode in our face and explode the peace.

The Palestinians should first make peace with Israel and then get their state. But I also
want to tell you this. After such a peace agreement is signed, Israel will not be the last
country to welcome a Palestinian state as a new member of the United Nations. We
will be the first.

And there’s one more thing. Hamas has been violating international law by holding
our soldier Gilad Shalit captive for five years.

They haven’t given even one Red Cross visit. He’s held in a dungeon, in darkness,
against all international norms. Gilad Shalit is the son of Aviva and Noam Shalit. He
is the grandson of Zvi Shalit, who escaped the Holocaust by coming to the — in the
1930s as a boy to the land of Israel. Gilad Shalit is the son of every Israeli family.
Every nation represented here should demand his immediate release. If you want to
pass a resolution about the Middle East today, that’s the resolution you should pass.
Ladies and gentlemen, last year in Israel in Bar-Ilan University, this year in the
Knesset and in the U.S. Congress, I laid out my vision for peace in which a
demilitarized Palestinian state recognizes the Jewish state. Yes, the Jewish state. After
all, this is the body that recognized the Jewish state 64 years ago. Now, don’t you
think it’s about time that Palestinians did the same?

The Jewish state of Israel will always protect the rights of all its minorities, including
the more than 1million Arab citizens of Israel. I wish I could say the same thing about
a future Palestinian state, for as Palestinian officials made clear the other day– in fact,
I think they made it right here in New York — they said the Palestinian state won’t
allow any Jews in it. They’ll be Jew-free — Judenrein. That’s ethnic cleansing. There
are laws today in Ramallah that make the selling of land to Jews punishable by death.
That’s racism. And you know which laws this evokes.

Israel has no intention whatsoever to change the democratic character of our state. We
just don’t want the Palestinians to try to change the Jewish character of our state. We
want to give up — we want them to give up the fantasy of flooding Israel with millions
of Palestinians.

President Abbas just stood here, and he said that the core of the Israeli-Palestinian
conflict is the settlements. Well, that’s odd. Our conflict has been raging for — was
raging for nearly half a century before there was a single Israeli settlement in the West
Bank. So if what President Abbas is saying was true, then the — I guess that the
settlements he’s talking about are Tel Aviv, Haifa, Jaffa, Be’er Sheva. Maybe that’s
what he meant the other day when he said that Israel has been occupying Palestinian
land for 63 years. He didn’t say from 1967; he said from1948. I hope somebody will
bother to ask him this question because it illustrates a simple truth: The core of the
conflict is not the settlements. The settlements are a result of the conflict..

The settlements have to be –it’s an issue that has to be addressed and resolved in the
course of negotiations. But the core of the conflict has always been and unfortunately
remains the refusal of the Palestinians to recognize a Jewish state in any border.
I think it’s time that the Palestinian leadership recognizes what every serious
international leader has recognized, from Lord Balfour and Lloyd George in 1917, to
President Truman in1948, to President Obama just two days ago right here: Israel is
the Jewish state.

President Abbas, stop walking around this issue. Recognize the Jewish state, and
make peace with us. In such a genuine peace, Israel is prepared to make painful
compromises. We believe that the Palestinians should be neither the citizens of Israel
nor its subjects. They should live in a free state of their own. But they should be ready,
like us, for compromise. And we will know that they’re ready for compromise and for
peace when they start taking Israel’s security requirements seriously and when they
stop denying our historical connection to our ancient homeland.

I often hear them accuse Israel of Judaizing Jerusalem. That’s like accusing America
of Americanizing Washington, or the British of Anglicizing London. You know why
we’re called “Jews”? Because we come from Judea.

In my office in Jerusalem, there’s a — there’s an ancient seal. It’s a signet ring of a
Jewish official from the time of the Bible. The seal was found right next to the
Western Wall, and it dates back 2,700 years, to the time of King Hezekiah. Now,
there’s a name of the Jewish official inscribed on the ring in Hebrew. His name was
Netanyahu. That’s my last name. My first name, Benjamin, dates back a thousand
years earlier to Benjamin — Binyamin — the son of Jacob, who was also known as
Israel. Jacob and his 12 sons roamed these same hills of Judea and Samaria 4,000
years ago, and there’s been a continuous Jewish presence in the land ever since.
And for those Jews who were exiled from our land, they never stopped dreaming of
coming back: Jews in Spain, on the eve of their expulsion; Jews in the Ukraine,
fleeing the pogroms; Jews fighting the Warsaw Ghetto, as the Nazis were circling
around it. They never stopped praying, they never stopped yearning. They whispered:
Next year in Jerusalem. Next year in the promised land.

As the prime minister of Israel, I speak for a hundred generations of Jews who were
dispersed throughout the lands, who suffered every evil under the Sun, but who never
gave up hope of restoring their national life in the one and only Jewish state.

Ladies and gentlemen, I continue to hope that President Abbas will be my partner in
peace. I’ve worked hard to advance that peace. The day I came into office, I called for
direct negotiations without preconditions. President Abbas didn’t respond. I outlined a
vision of peace of two states for two peoples. He still didn’t respond. I removed
hundreds of roadblocks and checkpoints, to ease freedom of movement in the
Palestinian areas; this facilitated a fantastic growth in the Palestinian economy. But
again — no response. I took the unprecedented step of freezing new buildings in the
settlements for 10 months. No prime minister did that before, ever. Once again — you
applaud, but there was no response. No response.

In the last few weeks, American officials have put forward ideas to restart peace talks.
There were things in those ideas about borders that I didn’t like. There were things
thereabout the Jewish state that I’m sure the Palestinians didn’t like.

But with all my reservations, I was willing to move forward on these American ideas.
President Abbas, why don’t you join me? We have to stop negotiating about the negotiations. Let’s just get on with it. Let’s negotiate peace.

I spent years defending Israel on the battlefield. I spent decades defending Israel in the court of public opinion. President Abbas, you’ve dedicated your life to advancing the Palestinian cause. Must this conflict continue for generations, or will we be able our children and our grandchildren to speak in years ahead of how we found a way to end it? That’s what we should aim for, and that’s what I believe we can achieve.
In two and a half years, we met in Jerusalem only once, even though my door has always been open to you. If you wish, I’ll come to Ramallah. Actually, I have a better suggestion. We’ve both just flown thousands of miles to New York. Now we’re in the same city. We’re in the same building. So let’s meet here today in the United Nations. Who’s there to stop us? What is there to stop us? If we genuinely want peace, what is there to stop us from meeting today and beginning peace negotiations?

And I suggest we talk openly and honestly. Let’s listen to one another. Let’s do as we say in the Middle East: Let’s talk “doogri”. That means straightforward. I’ll tell you my needs and concerns. You’ll tell me yours. And with God’s help, we’ll find the common ground of peace.

There’s an old Arab saying that you cannot applaud with one hand. Well, the same is true of peace. I cannot make peace alone. I cannot make peace without you. President Abbas, I extend my hand — the hand of Israel — in peace. I hope that you will grasp that hand. We are both the sons of Abraham. My people call him Avraham. Your people call him Ibrahim. We share the same patriarch. We dwell in the same land. Our destinies are intertwined. Let us realize the vision of Isaiah –(Isaiah 9:1in Hebrew) — “The people who walk in darkness will see a great light.” Let that light be the light of peace.